BlackRock's $5.92T 13F Looks Familiar, but the Top Ten Still Stop at 30.4%
BlackRock held the same mega-cap leadership cohort as other giant institutions in Q4 2025, but the top ten still totaled only 30.4% of the filing.
BlackRock, Inc. held a $5.92 trillion Q4 2025 filing led by NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. None of that is surprising. The more useful fact is that the top ten still totaled only 30.44% of assets. This is the giant-index-manager version of concentration: the famous names dominate the headline, but the overall structure is still broad enough to resist being reduced to a handful of stocks.
TL;DR
- 13F AUM: $5.92T.
- Largest position: NVDA at 6.13%.
- Top-5 concentration: 21.58%.
- Top-10 concentration: 30.44%.
- Main read: The filing is familiar at the top, but still structurally broad.
- Compare with: Vanguard and JPMorgan.
Filing Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| 13F AUM | $5.92T |
| Largest position | NVDA at 6.13% |
| Top-3 weight | 16.36% |
| Top-5 weight | 21.58% |
| Top-10 weight | 30.44% |
BlackRock Top Holdings — Q4 2025 ($B)
The Filing Is More Breadth Story Than Conviction Story
BlackRock owns the same leadership cluster as the rest of giant institutional America. But the more important point is how quickly the weights step down after the very top. NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft matter. Yet the top ten still leave almost 70% of the filing outside the headline names.
That makes the filing more useful as a map of index-era leadership than as a conventional conviction read. It shows where BlackRock's enormous passive and quasi-passive exposure naturally accumulates, not just where the firm is making a narrow active bet.
BlackRock Concentration Markers (%)
Why This Still Matters
Even a structurally broad filing can tell you something if the same leadership names keep appearing at meaningful weights. BlackRock's filing confirms the durability of the mega-cap technology and platform hierarchy, even as the total portfolio remains very wide.
Questions Investors Search For
Is BlackRock concentrated?
At the top, moderately. Structurally, it is still very broad.
Why does a 30% top ten matter?
Because it shows the headline names are important, but not dominant enough to make the entire filing fragile.
How should investors use this filing?
As a leadership map for giant-scale institutional ownership rather than a copyable concentrated portfolio.
Related Research
Explore all researchHSBC Holdings PLC held a staggering $175.9 trillion Q4 2025 13F, yet the top five still concentrated 25.2% in U.S. mega-cap leaders led by NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Apple.
Mar 7, 2026
JPMorgan, Vanguard, Capital World Investors, and FMR all own the market leaders, but their top-ten concentration ranges from 26.3% to 36.4%, creating very different portfolio behavior.
Mar 7, 2026
Norges Bank held a $934.8B Q4 2025 filing with a clean mega-cap hierarchy led by NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet.
Mar 7, 2026
FMR LLC gave NVIDIA a 9.23% weight in Q4 2025, with Microsoft, Apple, Meta, and Amazon behind it. The result is a giant filing that still carries clear growth concentration.
Mar 7, 2026
Capital International Investors built a Q4 2025 filing led by Broadcom, Microsoft, and Google, with a 35.6% top ten and a top book that also included Philip Morris and Amazon.
Mar 7, 2026