BlackRock's $5.92T 13F Looks Familiar, but the Top Ten Still Stop at 30.4%
BlackRock held the same mega-cap leadership cohort as other giant institutions in Q4 2025, but the top ten still totaled only 30.4% of the filing.
BlackRock, Inc. held a $5.92 trillion Q4 2025 filing led by NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. None of that is surprising. The more useful fact is that the top ten still totaled only 30.44% of assets. This is the giant-index-manager version of concentration: the famous names dominate the headline, but the overall structure is still broad enough to resist being reduced to a handful of stocks.
TL;DR
- 13F AUM: $5.92T.
- Largest position: NVDA at 6.13%.
- Top-5 concentration: 21.58%.
- Top-10 concentration: 30.44%.
- Main read: The filing is familiar at the top, but still structurally broad.
- Compare with: Vanguard and JPMorgan.
Filing Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| 13F AUM | $5.92T |
| Largest position | NVDA at 6.13% |
| Top-3 weight | 16.36% |
| Top-5 weight | 21.58% |
| Top-10 weight | 30.44% |
BlackRock Top Holdings — Q4 2025 ($B)
The Filing Is More Breadth Story Than Conviction Story
BlackRock owns the same leadership cluster as the rest of giant institutional America. But the more important point is how quickly the weights step down after the very top. NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft matter. Yet the top ten still leave almost 70% of the filing outside the headline names.
That makes the filing more useful as a map of index-era leadership than as a conventional conviction read. It shows where BlackRock's enormous passive and quasi-passive exposure naturally accumulates, not just where the firm is making a narrow active bet.
BlackRock Concentration Markers (%)
Why This Still Matters
Even a structurally broad filing can tell you something if the same leadership names keep appearing at meaningful weights. BlackRock's filing confirms the durability of the mega-cap technology and platform hierarchy, even as the total portfolio remains very wide.
Questions Investors Search For
Is BlackRock concentrated?
At the top, moderately. Structurally, it is still very broad.
Why does a 30% top ten matter?
Because it shows the headline names are important, but not dominant enough to make the entire filing fragile.
How should investors use this filing?
As a leadership map for giant-scale institutional ownership rather than a copyable concentrated portfolio.
Related Research
Explore all researchCalPERS used Q4 2025 to keep broad-market exposure high through VOO while still adding to Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet and Broadcom. The next filing will show whether the pension giant keeps that simple beta-heavy structure or rotates again.
Apr 17, 2026
Nuveen’s Q4 2025 filing stayed large-cap and AI-heavy at the top, but the more revealing addition was a sizable fixed-income sleeve through NXUS and NHYB. The next filing will show whether those credit and bond ETFs remain central or fade back out.
Apr 17, 2026
Fisher’s Q4 2025 filing was still packed with mega-cap tech, but the bigger tell was a giant Treasury and investment-grade corporate bond sleeve built through IEF and VCIT. The next filing will show whether that duration bet was tactical or structural.
Apr 17, 2026
AQR’s Q4 2025 filing kept expanding, with AUM rising to $190.63B, 69 new names, and a dramatic Bristol Myers build inside an already broad book. The next filing will show whether the quant giant keeps pressing this expansion or starts normalizing the roster again.
Apr 17, 2026
Victory Capital kept mega-cap tech on top in Q4 2025, but the sharper signal was in the secondary moves: large increases in Netflix, Constellation Energy, TSMC and new positions like IQVIA. The next filing will show whether that diversification continues.
Apr 17, 2026