Capital World Investors' $735B Q4 2025 13F: Reddit, Johnson & Johnson, and a Big Quality Reset

Marcus Chen

Capital World Investors opened 41 new stakes, including Johnson & Johnson and Reddit, while dumping Palantir and other prior winners.

Capital World Investors filed a Q4 2025 13F showing $735.3B in reported value, and the most interesting detail is not just the size. It is the shape of the repositioning: This filing looks like a quality reset from a manager that wanted to recycle some momentum gains into larger, steadier franchises without abandoning growth entirely.

TL;DR

  • Reported AUM: $735.3B across 574 holdings.
  • Top holding: BROADCOM INC (AVGO) at 5.8% of the portfolio.
  • Fresh activity: 41 new positions and 41 complete exits versus Q3 2025.
  • Biggest increase: NFLX rose 859% quarter over quarter.
  • Biggest decrease: MAA fell 97% quarter over quarter.
  • Whale Score: 75.50, which keeps this manager firmly in the upper tier of institutional quality screens.
  • Key read-through: This filing looks like a quality reset from a manager that wanted to recycle some momentum gains into larger, steadier franchises without abandoning growth entirely.

Filing Snapshot

MetricValue
ManagerCapital World Investors
QuarterQ4 2025
Filing date2026-02-11
Reported value$735.3B
Unique holdings574
Whale Score75.50

Capital World Investors Top Holdings - Q4 2025 ($B)

Loading Chart...

Capital World Investors 13F AUM History

Loading Chart...

What Changed

The headline holdings already tell the story. This was a quarter built around BROADCOM INC (AVGO), MICROSOFT CORP (MSFT), META PLATFORMS INC (META), NVIDIA CORPORATION (NVDA), PHILIP MORRIS INTL INC (PM). For a manager this large, concentration at the top matters more than the 80th position because the top sleeve is where the real view shows up.

Compared with Q3 2025, the filing shows 41 fresh entries and 41 full exits. That matters because broad turnover in a mega-book usually signals a screen change, a risk-budget change, or both. It is usually too large to dismiss as cash management noise.

The most aggressive increase among overlapping names was NFLX, up about 859% quarter over quarter. That kind of move usually means the manager wanted a cleaner expression of a theme rather than a passive carry-over.

On the other side, MAA was cut hardest. These sharp reductions often matter as much as new buys because they reveal which exposures lost priority when capital had to be reallocated.

Why It Matters

This filing looks like a quality reset from a manager that wanted to recycle some momentum gains into larger, steadier franchises without abandoning growth entirely. For retail readers, the practical takeaway is to focus on the positions that sit near the top of the portfolio and on the names that changed by triple-digit percentages. That is where the signal is strongest.

This is also why comparing managers like Vanguard, BlackRock, and Capital World Investors can be so useful. Passive giants tell you what broad market ownership looks like. A filing like this tells you where a more opinionated allocator is choosing to be different.

What Analysts Might Misread

The easiest mistake is to treat every large disclosed position as a fresh bullish call. That is not always true. Some large positions are inherited, benchmark-aware, or tax-managed. The better way to read this filing is to separate stable core weights from names where size changed abruptly.

Questions Investors Are Really Asking

What did Capital World Investors buy in Q4 2025?

The biggest disclosed additions centered on AVGO, MSFT, META, with 41 new positions overall in the filing.

What is the biggest position in Capital World Investors's Q4 2025 13F?

BROADCOM INC was the largest disclosed holding at about 5.8% of the reported portfolio.

Did Capital World Investors become more concentrated in Q4 2025?

The filing suggests a more opinionated book around the top holdings, with the five largest positions accounting for roughly 19.8% of reported value.

Why does this Q4 2025 filing matter?

This filing looks like a quality reset from a manager that wanted to recycle some momentum gains into larger, steadier franchises without abandoning growth entirely.

Explore all research