Geode Capital Management’s $1.62T Q4 2025 Filing Reveals Fidelity’s Shadow Index Giant
Geode Capital Management’s Q4 2025 13F highlights how a behind-the-scenes Fidelity sub-adviser concentrated enormous benchmark-driven capital in Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and other mega-cap leaders.
TL;DR
- Geode Capital Management reported $1.62T for Q4 2025, making it one of the largest disclosed U.S. equity books on 13F Insight.
- The portfolio reads less like an active hedge fund and more like a giant index engine: NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL made up 27.0% of the filing, while the top 10 reached 37.8%.
- The most important Q4 takeaway is not a sudden stock-picking pivot. It is the scale of Geode’s benchmark-heavy machine, which sits behind Fidelity’s fund ecosystem and channels enormous capital into the same mega-cap winners that define major indexes.
Geode describes itself publicly as a systematic asset manager focused on efficient core beta exposures, and recent 2025 sub-advisory filings tied to Fidelity-sponsored funds reinforce that behind-the-scenes role. That context is essential for interpreting this quarter: Geode is the kind of manager whose 13F can look “quiet” on the surface while still revealing where massive passive and quasi-passive capital is concentrated.
Geode Capital Management top holdings in Q4 2025 ($B)
Geode’s Q4 2025 filing shows the scale of Fidelity’s shadow index giant
Geode Capital Management’s filer page shows why the firm matters. The Q4 2025 filing carried $1.62T in reported AUM, a WhaleScore of 70.50, and 8,528 positions. That breadth matters. A portfolio this large is not making a narrow thematic bet; it is expressing how benchmark-linked institutional capital was distributed at year-end.
The leadership layer is still striking. NVIDIA led at $109.45B and 7.54% of the portfolio. Apple followed at $97.03B and 6.68%, while Microsoft came in at $88.06B and 6.07%. Together, those three names represented 20.29% of the filing. Add Amazon and Alphabet Class A, and the top five climb to the user-supplied 27.0% concentration mark.
That is the core angle for investors: Geode is “invisible” in the sense that it is not usually discussed like a star stock picker, but its filing is a clean map of where index-scale money ends up. If investors want to know which companies sit at the center of institutional beta in late 2025, Geode’s top lines answer that question immediately.
The filing looks like an index portfolio because that is essentially what it is
Web context matters here. Geode’s public materials emphasize systematic implementation, risk-managed portfolio construction, and core beta exposures. Fidelity fund documents filed in 2025 also show Geode continuing to serve as a sub-adviser on selected Fidelity products. Put differently, Geode is not trying to look like a concentrated Tiger Cub. It is built to scale broad market exposures efficiently.
That business model explains why the top of the filing mirrors the market’s mega-cap leadership cohort. Beyond NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft, the next tier includes Broadcom at $38.40B, Meta at $34.73B, Alphabet Class C at $33.77B, Tesla at $29.43B, and Eli Lilly at $21.22B. There is no mystery factor bet hiding here. The portfolio is dominated by the same platform, semiconductor, cloud, and growth franchises that drove benchmark returns.
It is also why concentration should be interpreted carefully. A 37.8% top-10 weight would be aggressive for a classic diversified mutual fund stock picker. For a benchmark-heavy giant with thousands of positions, it is better read as a reflection of index concentration in the U.S. equity market itself.
Do not overread the “new position” labels
The fact pack tags each top holding as a “new position,” but the broader dataset tells investors to be skeptical of a literal reading. The AUM history moves from $1.57B in 2025Q3 to $1.62T in 2025Q4, and the user brief explicitly notes an earlier-quarter reporting regime that used billions before a trillion-scale reading appears in Q4. That kind of discontinuity strongly suggests a reporting-basis change or normalization reset, not that Geode suddenly bought the entire mega-cap complex in one quarter.
For practical purposes, the right way to read this filing is as a scale snapshot, not a turnover story. Investors should focus on the structure of the book: mega-cap tech leadership, broad diversification underneath, and a portfolio footprint that aligns with systematic index implementation.
Geode’s reported 13F AUM history shows a Q4 2025 reporting discontinuity
Top holdings table: where Geode’s disclosed capital sat at year-end
| Ticker | Value | Portfolio weight | Shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $109.45B | 7.54% | 588.80M |
| AAPL | $97.03B | 6.68% | 358.03M |
| MSFT | $88.06B | 6.07% | 182.62M |
| AMZN | $51.75B | 3.57% | 225.12M |
| GOOGL | $45.63B | 3.14% | 146.19M |
| AVGO | $38.40B | 2.64% | 111.28M |
| META | $34.73B | 2.39% | 52.81M |
| GOOG | $33.77B | 2.33% | 108.12M |
| TSLA | $29.43B | 2.03% | 65.70M |
| LLY | $21.22B | 1.46% | 19.81M |
The table reinforces the main point: Geode’s book is broad, but the dollars still pool in the same handful of companies that dominate cap-weighted U.S. benchmarks. NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft alone stand far above the rest of the field, and Alphabet appears twice through both share classes.
Concentration summary: broad underneath, concentrated at the surface
| Metric | Value | What it suggests |
|---|---|---|
| Reported AUM | $1.62T | Institutional scale that few active managers can match. |
| WhaleScore | 70.50 | A high-profile filer whose positioning matters for market structure analysis. |
| Total positions | 8,528 | Extreme breadth consistent with a benchmark-heavy implementation engine. |
| Top-5 concentration | 27.0% | Mega-cap leadership is powerful, but not enough to make the book narrowly concentrated. |
| Top-10 concentration | 37.8% | The portfolio surface is concentrated even while the underlying book remains diversified. |
What investors should take away
Geode’s Q4 2025 filing is useful precisely because it is not a personality-driven portfolio. It shows where vast pools of benchmark-sensitive capital sat after a year when market leadership kept narrowing into a short list of mega-cap franchises. If an investor wants to understand the center of gravity in institutional U.S. equities, Geode’s 13F is one of the cleanest snapshots available.
The filing also offers a warning. When top weights like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT dominate even inside one of the broadest portfolios in the dataset, market concentration is no longer just a hedge-fund story. It is embedded in the passive plumbing of the market itself.
That is why the best description of Geode in Q4 2025 may be simple: not a flashy alpha hunter, but a $1.62T shadow index giant whose filing reveals how benchmark power is shaping the equity market from underneath.
Related Research
Explore all researchVictory Capital kept mega-cap tech on top in Q4 2025, but the sharper signal was in the secondary moves: large increases in Netflix, Constellation Energy, TSMC and new positions like IQVIA. The next filing will show whether that diversification continues.
Apr 17, 2026
CalPERS used Q4 2025 to keep broad-market exposure high through VOO while still adding to Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet and Broadcom. The next filing will show whether the pension giant keeps that simple beta-heavy structure or rotates again.
Apr 17, 2026
Nuveen’s Q4 2025 filing stayed large-cap and AI-heavy at the top, but the more revealing addition was a sizable fixed-income sleeve through NXUS and NHYB. The next filing will show whether those credit and bond ETFs remain central or fade back out.
Apr 17, 2026
AQR’s Q4 2025 filing kept expanding, with AUM rising to $190.63B, 69 new names, and a dramatic Bristol Myers build inside an already broad book. The next filing will show whether the quant giant keeps pressing this expansion or starts normalizing the roster again.
Apr 17, 2026
Fisher’s Q4 2025 filing was still packed with mega-cap tech, but the bigger tell was a giant Treasury and investment-grade corporate bond sleeve built through IEF and VCIT. The next filing will show whether that duration bet was tactical or structural.
Apr 17, 2026