Integrated Investment Consultants Built a Style-Box ETF Core With a UWM Outlier in Q4 2025
Integrated Investment Consultants reported a Q4 2025 filing dominated by style-box ETFs, with UWMC standing out as the largest non-ETF exception.
Integrated Investment Consultants filed a Q4 2025 book that practically announced its own portfolio-construction philosophy. The largest lines were IWF, IWP, NEAR, IWD, and IEFA. The standout exception was UWMC, which ranked as the third-largest position and broke up an otherwise style-box ETF-heavy top tier.
TL;DR
- Core structure: the top of the portfolio was overwhelmingly ETF-driven.
- Growth and value split: IWF, IWP, and IWD gave the book an explicit style-box framework.
- Defensive sleeve: NEAR added short-duration bond exposure near the top of the filing.
- Outlier: UWMC was the biggest non-ETF position in the first cluster of holdings.
- Best interpretation: this was a model-portfolio architecture first, with selective stock exceptions layered in.
Filing Snapshot
| Holdings | 262 displayed positions |
|---|---|
| Top-1 weight | 7.1% |
| Top-5 weight | 24.4% |
| ETF-heavy top 10 | Yes |
| Largest non-ETF | UWMC at 4.6% |
Integrated Investment Top Holdings - Q4 2025 ($M)
The book is a framework before it is a stock list
This filing is a classic example of a manager expressing views through style buckets rather than through a small set of favorite stocks. large-cap growth, mid-cap growth, large-cap value, international developed equities, and dividend equities all sat near the top. That tells you the manager cared about factor balance and allocation scaffolding.
The interesting wrinkle is UWMC. It is large enough to count as a real active choice, not just an incidental small stock. That kind of outlier is exactly why ETF-heavy filings should still be read carefully rather than dismissed.
Integrated Investment Top-10 Mix: ETFs vs Single Stocks
What this filing is really saying
The filing says the manager wanted a structured growth-value-international-income mix, with a few selective single-name deviations. That is a very different message from a pure stock-picker portfolio, and it is why readers should combine this with the ETF-dominant guide and the same-stock-opposite-reasons guide.
Q&A
Is UWMC the main signal here?
It is the main non-ETF signal, but the larger message is still the ETF framework surrounding it.
Why does NEAR matter?
Because having a short-duration bond ETF near the top changes how you should read the whole risk posture.
Does this look active or passive?
It looks like active allocation expressed through passive building blocks.
What should investors watch next quarter?
Watch whether the ETF style box stays stable and whether the stock-specific exceptions get larger or smaller.
Related Research
Explore all researchTempo Wealth reported a one-quarter Q4 2025 book led by Parker-Hannifin and Progressive, but the surrounding structure was unmistakably ETF-driven.
Mar 9, 2026
Nuveen held $382B across 5,869 positions in Q4 2025. The top positions are index ETFs (IVV, SPY, VTI), revealing an advisor-distribution model, not a stock-picking operation.
Mar 9, 2026
Amundi's 13F AUM surged from $271B in Q3 2024 to $368B in Q4 2025 — a 36% increase. With 5,068 holdings, the French giant is quietly building one of the largest U.S. equity portfolios in the world.
Mar 9, 2026
LPL Financial's 13F grew from $224B to $366B in six quarters — a 63% surge. With 5,869 positions led by index ETFs, LPL's filing is a proxy for independent advisor sentiment.
Mar 9, 2026
Franklin Templeton's 13F reveals $408B across 14,263 holdings in Q4 2025. Microsoft leads at just 4.7%, followed by Nvidia at 4.4%. Extreme diversification masks a mega-cap core.
Mar 9, 2026