Qube Research Q4 2025 13F: Quant Breadth With a Mega-Cap Core

Sarah Mitchell

Qube Research & Technologies Ltd's Q4 2025 13F shows $98.44B in reported value, led by NVDA and a diversified institutional tail.

Why This Q4 Filing Is Worth Reading

Qube Research & Technologies Ltd reported $98.44B of 13F assets for 2025Q4, with 500 displayed positions in the current holdings view and a WhaleScore of 58.75. This is not a single-stock manifesto. It is a scaled institutional filing, so the useful signal is the shape of exposure: which names dominate the dollars, how much of the portfolio sits in the first screen, and whether the same market factors show up across comparable filers.

The largest displayed holding was NVDA at $2.41B, equal to 2.91% of disclosed value. The top five represented about 11.3% of the portfolio, while the top ten represented about 18.2%. That is enough concentration to matter, but still broad enough that investors should read the filing as a diversified institutional book rather than a narrow hedge-fund bet.

Qube Research & Technologies Ltd Top Holdings — 2025Q4 ($M)

Loading Chart...

The Top-Holdings Map

The top holdings show how heavily the current institutional market still leans on mega-cap technology, platform software, semiconductors, and large financial or consumer franchises. In this run, the generated fact pack does not provide a reliable prior-quarter position-change table, so this article treats the filing as a Q4 snapshot rather than claiming that each top row was a fresh purchase.

TickerValueWeightShares
NVDA$2.41B2.91%12.90M
AAPL$2.03B2.45%7.45M
AMZN$1.78B2.15%7.73M
MSFT$1.67B2.02%3.46M
GOOGL$1.49B1.80%4.77M
AVGO$1.45B1.75%4.18M
WMT$1.35B1.63%12.08M
AMD$1.09B1.31%5.07M

That caveat is important. A 13F snapshot can tell you where reported value sits today; it cannot, without a clean comparable baseline, prove intent. The current book still gives investors a useful risk map. A reader can compare NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, AMZN, and AVGO exposure across FIL Ltd, Schroder, Nordea, and Qube Research to see whether the same names are becoming crowded institutional defaults.

Qube Research & Technologies Ltd Top 5 vs Rest Concentration — 2025Q4

Loading Chart...

Concentration, Not Just Size

The top-five-versus-rest chart keeps the interpretation grounded. Qube Research & Technologies Ltd's first five displayed holdings made up roughly 11.3% of the filing, leaving about 88.7% in the remaining tail. That means the biggest names can still drive reported returns, but the book is not simply a one-stock or one-sector vehicle.

For retail investors, that distinction changes how the data should be used. Copying only the top few positions can create a much more concentrated portfolio than the filer actually reported. A better use is to identify which exposures are common across large institutions and then ask what catalyst could challenge the shared thesis.

Qube Research & Technologies Ltd AUM History

Loading Chart...

The AUM Trend

The history table adds context to the current report. Recent values moved through 2025Q1 at $86.21B, 2025Q2 at $98.42B, 2025Q3 at $96.78B, 2025Q4 at $98.44B. Those moves can reflect price performance, reporting scope, amendments, and actual allocation changes. They should not be read as pure inflow or outflow without supporting evidence.

QuarterReported 13F ValueHoldings
2024Q1$63.08B5292
2024Q2$63.27B5720
2024Q3$67.85B3210
2024Q4$76.27B3415
2025Q1$86.21B3445
2025Q2$98.42B3505
2025Q3$96.78B3528
2025Q4$98.44B3633

The Investor Takeaway

Qube Research & Technologies Ltd's Q4 2025 filing is most useful as a market-structure signal. It shows where a scaled institutional holder had its largest disclosed U.S.-listed equity exposure at quarter-end. The strongest takeaway is not that every top position is a new conviction buy; it is that mega-cap technology and related platform exposure remain the common language of large institutional portfolios.

Used correctly, this filing can help investors compare crowding, concentration, and portfolio breadth. Used incorrectly, it can tempt investors to clone a few large rows and miss the diversification, mandate, and reporting context that made the original filing look the way it did.

Explore all research