Wellington Management's $571B Q4 2025 Filing Hides a Healthcare Conviction Bet Beneath the Mega-Cap Surface
Wellington Management held $570.7B across 1,878 positions in Q4 2025. Eli Lilly and Merck sit at #7 and #8, giving healthcare a 4.1% share of the top-12 — unusual for a fund this size.
Wellington Management Group filed its Q4 2025 13F showing $570.7 billion across 1,878 unique holdings — essentially flat from $571.3B in Q3. The top six names are the usual mega-cap suspects. But positions #7 and #8 tell a different story: Eli Lilly (LLY) at $14.4B (2.52%) and Merck (MRK) at $9.1B (1.59%). For a fund this size, having two pharma names in the top 8 is a deliberate healthcare conviction bet.
TL;DR
- AUM: $570.7B (Q4 2025), flat from $571.3B (Q3) — less than 0.1% change
- Holdings count: 1,878 unique — mid-range concentration for a $500B+ filer
- Top holding: Nvidia (NVDA) at 4.60%, worth $26.2B
- Healthcare conviction: LLY ($14.4B, 2.52%) + MRK ($9.1B, 1.59%) + UNH ($5.2B, 0.91%) = $28.6B in healthcare in top 12
- Top-5 concentration: 18.4% — moderate for an active manager
- Financials accent: Wells Fargo ($6.7B) and Mastercard ($7.7B) in top 10
- Whale Score: 73.00
Wellington Management Top 12 Holdings — Q4 2025 ($B)
The Healthcare Layer: LLY, MRK, UNH
Eli Lilly at $14.4B is Wellington's 7th largest position — the GLP-1/obesity drug thesis that has driven LLY's multi-year run. Merck at $9.1B (86.4M shares) provides a different healthcare exposure: Keytruda-driven oncology revenue. And UnitedHealth Group at $5.2B adds managed care. Together, these three healthcare names account for $28.6B (5.0% of the portfolio).
Compare this to pure index managers like Vanguard or BlackRock, where healthcare weighting mirrors the S&P 500 (~12-13%). Wellington's active overweight in specific pharma names signals genuine sector conviction.
Flat AUM: The Dog That Didn't Bark
Wellington's AUM barely moved: $571.3B to $570.7B, a -0.1% change. In a quarter where most mega-filers grew, this flatline is notable. It suggests either modest net outflows offsetting market gains, or deliberate portfolio de-risking that kept the book from growing with the market.
Wellington Management AUM History (2025)
What Analysts Might Misread
Misread #1: “Flat AUM means Wellington is losing assets”
The $600M decline on a $571B base is noise, not signal. Holdings count barely changed (7,635 to 7,580). This is a steady-state quarter, not a contraction story.
Misread #2: “Two pharma stocks doesn't make a healthcare bet”
At Wellington's scale, $14.4B in LLY alone is a $14.4 billion active decision. Combined with MRK and UNH, that's $28.6B in healthcare — more than many dedicated healthcare funds manage in total AUM.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wellington Management's largest holding?
Nvidia at 4.60% ($26.2B), followed by Microsoft at 4.15% ($23.7B) and Apple at 3.68% ($21.0B).
Does Wellington have a healthcare overweight?
Yes. Eli Lilly (#7, $14.4B), Merck (#8, $9.1B), and UnitedHealth (#12, $5.2B) give Wellington $28.6B in healthcare in the top 12 — a notable concentration for a diversified manager.
How big is Wellington Management?
$570.7B in 13F AUM across 1,878 unique holdings as of Q4 2025. Wellington is one of the largest independently owned investment management firms globally.
Related Research
Explore all researchDDOG has 1,078 institutional holders and 15 active top-20 names in the current ownership map.
A data-first look at SCHW's institutional ownership map, active-holder depth, and the next 13F checks investors should make.
A data-first look at RIVN's institutional ownership map, active-holder depth, and the next 13F checks investors should make.
A data-first look at PPL's institutional ownership map, active-holder depth, and the next 13F checks investors should make.
A data-first look at ANET's institutional ownership map, active-holder depth, and the next 13F checks investors should make.